<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Charles &#8220;Chip&#8221; Goodyear IV an impostor?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:48:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-1546</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnharding.com/?p=429#comment-1546</guid>
		<description>Jim:
Thanks, and good work, yourself, for beating up on Zachary T. Goodyear, the desperate realtor. No - I am not zooming in on you, as you are getting at the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim:<br />
Thanks, and good work, yourself, for beating up on Zachary T. Goodyear, the desperate realtor. No &#8211; I am not zooming in on you, as you are getting at the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnharding.com/?p=429#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>Zachary T. Goodyear, do not fool around with JH. His intelligence reach is inmeasurable. Isn&#039;t it already obvious to you (if you had been following his thread) that he has had lunches with a well known previous CIA operative (for S.E. Asia region) in Singapore?

I sure would like to see the look on his face to discover that JH has zoomed in on his identity so quickly, fast and furious it would seem !

Er...John, hope you are not zooming in on me too....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zachary T. Goodyear, do not fool around with JH. His intelligence reach is inmeasurable. Isn&#8217;t it already obvious to you (if you had been following his thread) that he has had lunches with a well known previous CIA operative (for S.E. Asia region) in Singapore?</p>
<p>I sure would like to see the look on his face to discover that JH has zoomed in on his identity so quickly, fast and furious it would seem !</p>
<p>Er&#8230;John, hope you are not zooming in on me too&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnharding.com/?p=429#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>Dear Zachary T. Goodyear: Thank you for your comment which goes a long way to proving our case that Charles &quot;Chip&quot; Waterhouse Goodyear IV is an impostor. 

You state &quot;the true CWGIV, the one that is 75 years old, is Chip’s father. By this you are telling us that Charles Waterhouse Goodyear IV is the father of Charles &quot;Chip&quot; Waterhouse Goodyear IV - and that both father and son have the same generational tag &quot;IV&quot; after their names. Sorry, Zach, that is just not possible. Guess you thought we wouldn&#039;t read your misleading comment so carefully.

You state further that you are &quot;named after&quot; Zachary Goodyear, born in 1945. Hmmm.

No let me show you just how good an investigator I am. Your email address reveals your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zachgoodyear.com/&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;, and that you are a realtor working in Nashville Tennessee. Well, Zach, we know it is tough times for realtors, and maybe you wrote us to get a little publicity. Let me do you a favor, and publish your photograph to help you along. Maybe Charles &quot;Chip&quot; Waterhouse Goodyear IV is not the only impostor around.

&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.zachgoodyear.com.moses.com/images/topslice.gif&quot; alt=&quot;Good old Zach, the Realtor&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Zachary T. Goodyear: Thank you for your comment which goes a long way to proving our case that Charles &#8220;Chip&#8221; Waterhouse Goodyear IV is an impostor. </p>
<p>You state &#8220;the true CWGIV, the one that is 75 years old, is Chip’s father. By this you are telling us that Charles Waterhouse Goodyear IV is the father of Charles &#8220;Chip&#8221; Waterhouse Goodyear IV &#8211; and that both father and son have the same generational tag &#8220;IV&#8221; after their names. Sorry, Zach, that is just not possible. Guess you thought we wouldn&#8217;t read your misleading comment so carefully.</p>
<p>You state further that you are &#8220;named after&#8221; Zachary Goodyear, born in 1945. Hmmm.</p>
<p>No let me show you just how good an investigator I am. Your email address reveals your <a href="http://www.zachgoodyear.com/">website</a>, and that you are a realtor working in Nashville Tennessee. Well, Zach, we know it is tough times for realtors, and maybe you wrote us to get a little publicity. Let me do you a favor, and publish your photograph to help you along. Maybe Charles &#8220;Chip&#8221; Waterhouse Goodyear IV is not the only impostor around.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.zachgoodyear.com.moses.com/images/topslice.gif" alt="Good old Zach, the Realtor" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary T. Goodyear</title>
		<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary T. Goodyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnharding.com/?p=429#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>I stumbled across while researching some family history and had a good laugh.  There are some pretty wild claims here!  None that are true, but humorous nonetheless.  The tree you have is correct, good research, I have a framed copy of it in my house.  The Charles you are referring to (the true CWGIV, the one that is 75 years old), is Chip&#039;s father, my uncle, and great grandson of the CW Goodyear at the center of the tree.  Also, the Zachary above his name on the tree is just who I was named after, that&#039;s not me, so please don&#039;t start some rumor that I&#039;m also in the CIA or Iranian intelligence.

Also, YF Chew, for the record, there are several Charles Goodyears out there.  The Charles Goodyear who invented the volcanism of rubber is not any part of this family tree here.  The Charles W. Goodyear at the center of this tree was in the lumber and railroad business, not an inventor of rubber technologies.

So, while an amusing story, I can assure you and attest that Chip is not a hit man of any sort. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled across while researching some family history and had a good laugh.  There are some pretty wild claims here!  None that are true, but humorous nonetheless.  The tree you have is correct, good research, I have a framed copy of it in my house.  The Charles you are referring to (the true CWGIV, the one that is 75 years old), is Chip&#8217;s father, my uncle, and great grandson of the CW Goodyear at the center of the tree.  Also, the Zachary above his name on the tree is just who I was named after, that&#8217;s not me, so please don&#8217;t start some rumor that I&#8217;m also in the CIA or Iranian intelligence.</p>
<p>Also, YF Chew, for the record, there are several Charles Goodyears out there.  The Charles Goodyear who invented the volcanism of rubber is not any part of this family tree here.  The Charles W. Goodyear at the center of this tree was in the lumber and railroad business, not an inventor of rubber technologies.</p>
<p>So, while an amusing story, I can assure you and attest that Chip is not a hit man of any sort. <img src='http://johnharding.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masterservant</title>
		<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>masterservant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnharding.com/?p=429#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>well, since all our reserves are finished and temasek has to issue bonds, we might as well hand all our funds to uncle sam and bush and get done with it, be the newest state of uncle sam, broke anyway, no water, no oil, no nothing, except bricks.

but i&#039;ll kick the ass of these gov should i meet them on the streets, each and everyone of them and spit at them in the face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, since all our reserves are finished and temasek has to issue bonds, we might as well hand all our funds to uncle sam and bush and get done with it, be the newest state of uncle sam, broke anyway, no water, no oil, no nothing, except bricks.</p>
<p>but i&#8217;ll kick the ass of these gov should i meet them on the streets, each and everyone of them and spit at them in the face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloodrose</title>
		<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-1314</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloodrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnharding.com/?p=429#comment-1314</guid>
		<description>Hey, you know when they announced that dude to take over Temasek Holdings I made a prediction that it would be &quot;Bad Year&quot; and well indeed he got fired a few mths later so who knows =DD And my friends called me up to congratz me... lolx

Woah, gdyear has connections with CIA founder? Thats interesting!!! As you know, fact is indeed stranger than fiction huh? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, you know when they announced that dude to take over Temasek Holdings I made a prediction that it would be &#8220;Bad Year&#8221; and well indeed he got fired a few mths later so who knows =DD And my friends called me up to congratz me&#8230; lolx</p>
<p>Woah, gdyear has connections with CIA founder? Thats interesting!!! As you know, fact is indeed stranger than fiction huh? <img src='http://johnharding.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Harding</title>
		<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>John Harding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnharding.com/?p=429#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t think as well as the CIA pays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t think as well as the CIA pays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CIA Founder and Goodyear</title>
		<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>CIA Founder and Goodyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnharding.com/?p=429#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>Iranian intelligence pays well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iranian intelligence pays well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CIA Founder and Goodyear</title>
		<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>CIA Founder and Goodyear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnharding.com/?p=429#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>The  real Goodyear family started a law firm with the man who later founded the CIA.  You might be closer than you think on this thing sir...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The  real Goodyear family started a law firm with the man who later founded the CIA.  You might be closer than you think on this thing sir&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Low</title>
		<link>http://johnharding.com/2009/02/08/is-charles-chip-goodyear-iv-an-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Low</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnharding.com/?p=429#comment-881</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t anyone here smell something fishy ? There is obviously something very wrong here regarding this hiring of Goodyear guy and then subsequently firing him. The reason given that his corporate strategic outline was not in tandem with the Singapore political leadership&#039;s blueprint for the future WAS NOT A GOOD REASON. 

In fact it was obnoxious to have even given that as a reason at all. Didn&#039;t the leadership during the screening stage of Goodyear&#039;s recruitment interviews prioritise his views and strategic alignment as a pre-condition before anything elase? It doesn&#039;t make any sense to scout the whole for a &quot;best&quot; candidate and to offer him a top post and then, and only then after that to assess his strategic slant, whether it is in line with the leadership&#039;s charted direction.

You just simply don&#039;t employ the best hit man and after having him on the payroll to determine whether he will kill anybody, including his employer if need be. That should have been the top priority before anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t anyone here smell something fishy ? There is obviously something very wrong here regarding this hiring of Goodyear guy and then subsequently firing him. The reason given that his corporate strategic outline was not in tandem with the Singapore political leadership&#8217;s blueprint for the future WAS NOT A GOOD REASON. </p>
<p>In fact it was obnoxious to have even given that as a reason at all. Didn&#8217;t the leadership during the screening stage of Goodyear&#8217;s recruitment interviews prioritise his views and strategic alignment as a pre-condition before anything elase? It doesn&#8217;t make any sense to scout the whole for a &#8220;best&#8221; candidate and to offer him a top post and then, and only then after that to assess his strategic slant, whether it is in line with the leadership&#8217;s charted direction.</p>
<p>You just simply don&#8217;t employ the best hit man and after having him on the payroll to determine whether he will kill anybody, including his employer if need be. That should have been the top priority before anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
